Comments on: To JPEG2000 or JPEG 2000? That is the question… http://j2ktoday.com/2007/06/06/to-jpeg2000-or-jpeg-2000-that-is-the-question/ JPEG2000 in Digital Cinema, Broadcast and Surveillance Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:43:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: TINKU ACHARYA http://j2ktoday.com/2007/06/06/to-jpeg2000-or-jpeg-2000-that-is-the-question/#comment-195 TINKU ACHARYA Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:26:44 +0000 http://j2ktoday.com/2007/06/06/to-jpeg2000-or-jpeg-2000-that-is-the-question/#comment-195 THIS IS A VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE. NOW I STARTED TO WONDER WHY I PUT THE NAME "JPEG2000" IN MY BOOK INSTEAD OF JPEG 2000. I AM CONFUSED AND AMUZED.... HA HA HA...... TINKU ACHARYA THIS IS A VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE. NOW I STARTED TO WONDER WHY I PUT THE NAME “JPEG2000″ IN MY BOOK INSTEAD OF JPEG 2000. I AM CONFUSED AND AMUZED…. HA HA HA……

TINKU ACHARYA

]]> By: Komnick http://j2ktoday.com/2007/06/06/to-jpeg2000-or-jpeg-2000-that-is-the-question/#comment-14 Komnick Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:19:14 +0000 http://j2ktoday.com/2007/06/06/to-jpeg2000-or-jpeg-2000-that-is-the-question/#comment-14 Of note, the video editors in Mac OSX (iMovie and Final Cut) use JPEG 2000 (with a space) when saving a sequence of content. It uses the JP2 designation when saving single image frames. Of note, the video editors in Mac OSX (iMovie and Final Cut) use JPEG 2000 (with a space) when saving a sequence of content. It uses the JP2 designation when saving single image frames.

]]>